On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:47:59 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >John McKown wrote: > >>Not that I'm aware of. The only difference is that the batch job "uses up" an >>initiator. But once it is running, no real differences. Unless the STC is >>running a program which is in the PPT as having special properties, such as >>running non-key 8. > >Thanks for answering. You are too fast for me! ;-D > >In RACF another thing to consider is: The STC, may or may not be PRIVILEGED or >TRUSTED. That alone has a [somewhat small] performance impact in terms of SMF >records. > Time limit? Inactivity time limit?
Hmmm... If a batch job forks a child then the parent process exits, can the batch job step terminate before init reaps the child? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
