> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Norbert Friemel > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:13 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL pondering > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:07:41 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote: > > > Thanks for the example. Although the numeric sequence numbers were there > just to clarify the operation, > > rather than be an indication of the assumed format of an actual case. Do > > you > have an example where you > > can’t rely on a key/sequence field and have to depend on the actual > occurrence of the record order ? > > INREC adds a (binary) sequence number in position 81-84. OUTREC checks pos. > 81-84, not the sequence numbers in the example.
You're right. I read your example in a sloppy way. I was somehow prejudging your intent as of using the numbers. Sorry for that. (I'm somehow trigger happy at times.) Best Regards, Thomas Berg ___________________________________________________________________ Thomas Berg Specialist zOS/RQM/IT Delivery Swedbank AB (Publ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
