On 12/24/2014 03:35 AM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
This represents the first two comments I've seen claiming the demise of
Bookmanager to be a good thing. Versus some rather large number of us who are
resigned to a bad decision on the part of IBM.
<SNIPPAGE>
Unless I've gotten things very confused over the years, when the
Principles manual was put into the BookMangler format, the charts
were mostly unreadable.
The DAT chart was seriously mangled. The ART chart was
unintelligible -- at least to me. [Dynamic Address Translation,
Access Register Translation]
And, at that time, and in those days, I was regularly reading the
PoOP, because of the changes caused by ESA.
I have preferred the PDF version of manuals ever since.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN