On 12/24/2014 03:35 AM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
This represents the first two comments I've seen claiming the demise of 
Bookmanager to be a good thing. Versus some rather large number of us who are 
resigned to a bad decision on the part of IBM.

<SNIPPAGE>

Unless I've gotten things very confused over the years, when the Principles manual was put into the BookMangler format, the charts were mostly unreadable.

The DAT chart was seriously mangled. The ART chart was unintelligible -- at least to me. [Dynamic Address Translation, Access Register Translation]

And, at that time, and in those days, I was regularly reading the PoOP, because of the changes caused by ESA.

I have preferred the PDF version of manuals ever since.

Regards,
Steve Thompson

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to