I have never seen a PoOP in Bookmanager format. I would submit it as an 
exception (proving the rule:) 
PDF has it's uses. Printing and reading larger sections or all of a book. It is 
better than it used to be at searching. It's major (and with increasing band 
width a lesser concern) is the all or nothing aspect. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 5:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: publibz->infocenter->knowledgecenter
> 
> On 12/24/2014 03:35 AM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> > This represents the first two comments I've seen claiming the demise
> of Bookmanager to be a good thing. Versus some rather large number of
> us who are resigned to a bad decision on the part of IBM.
> >
> <SNIPPAGE>
> 
> Unless I've gotten things very confused over the years, when the
> Principles manual was put into the BookMangler format, the charts were
> mostly unreadable.
> 
> The DAT chart was seriously mangled. The ART chart was unintelligible -
> - at least to me. [Dynamic Address Translation, Access Register
> Translation]
> 
> And, at that time, and in those days, I was regularly reading the PoOP,
> because of the changes caused by ESA.
> 
> I have preferred the PDF version of manuals ever since.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve Thompson
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to