In <20141226151929.4ae52b84c9b55d029a0d6...@gmx.net>, on 12/26/2014
at 03:19 PM, ibmmain <nitz-...@gmx.net> said:
>Both are input by forces outside of my control
Perhaps by management fiat, but that's not IBM's doing. Put a JOB
statement in an IEFJOBS member and IBM won't add another one.
>> I tried to describe that "jobs" are supported only if they are
>> present in either IEFJOBS or IEFPDSI of MSTJCLxx.
>That is not quite true.
Not only is it true, but it is *precisely* what you are complaining
about. Putting a JOB statement in a cataloged procedure is not and
never has been supported.
>Once the JCL already containing a JOB statement is not contained
>in MSTJCLxx (only in the JES2 proclib concatenation), the
>automatic insertion of these two lines (by whatever) causes a JCL
>error.
Without those two lines you wouldn't have a started job at all.
>Does anyone else know where this insertion of the two lines is
>explained?
Look at 7.0 Chapter 7. Started Tasks in z/OS MVS JCL Reference,
SA22-7597.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
