On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
> Briefly, I would like to add a JCLLIB/INCLUDE to a proc in the PROCLIB > concatenation. I have to go with my hat in my hand to the powers that be to > edit the PROCLIB. (No approval needed for the specific changes; just to > make > any change.) If I could include (SET) statements from my own PDS my life > would be easier. I cannot because of the restrictions we have discussed > here. > > Charles I understand what you want and why. However, your real problem is not technical but managerial. In effect, management has said "no changes without authorization" and you _appear to me_ to be trying to figure out a way to effectively bypass this rule. Naughty, naughty! You will find some pseudo-coal in your stocking in the morning (Santa is doing his part to address "climate change" by substituting black coal-like rocks for real "evil" coal, due to pressure from environmental groups and the a threat of an EPA lawsuit. <grin/>). -- While a transcendent vocabulary is laudable, one must be eternally careful so that the calculated objective of communication does not become ensconced in obscurity. In other words, eschew obfuscation. 111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321 Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
