Gil: Actually I like that scenario. A lot of ways to skin the cat..so to speak
Regards, Scott www.idmworks.com On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Paul Gilmartin < 0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:06:47 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > > >In <023201d03e5f$e9f8b430$bdea1c90$@mcn.org>, on 02/01/2015 > > at 12:44 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> said: > > > >>Ah. Then you need to LINK or whatever to IKJEFT01 passing a parm off > >>R1 of 'command parameters ...' > > > >While tat woulf have woked with the original TMP. I'm not sure how > >well the current TMP will work if it is not the jobstep. > > > "address TSO" from a Rexx EXEC spawn()ed under Unix System Services > runs the TMP in a separate address space, perhaps more like a job step > task; certainly more roundabout. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
