On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 17:55:52 -0400 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> wrote:
:>In <[email protected]>, on :>03/15/2015 :> at 02:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin :><[email protected]> said: :>>It is the responsibility of an AC(0) routine residing in an :>>authorized library, then, to perform only documented actions, lest :>>no side effect threatens system integrity. :>It is not the responsibility of a module to test whether it was :>invoked with more authorization than it was designed for; it is the :>responsibility of the caller to verify that it does not amplify the :>authorization of the callee beyond what it is documented as :>supporting. It is the responsibility of the developer/sysprog to not place a module in an APF library unless it can properly handle being called APF. LINKLIST no longer means automatic APF. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
