On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:22:48 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)  wrote:
>>
>>>Consider:  SMP/E is APF authorized.  The only reason for this
>>>that I know is that SMP/E does DYNALLOC with S99WTDSN.
>>
>>IEBCOPY.
>>
> IEBCOPY doesn't require APF authorization.

... any more

In the past it did because it used EXCP appendages and, I think, did
page fixing itself. Which required APF authorization. IIRC, z/OS 2.1
totally eliminated that and IEBCOPY in z/OS 2.1 is marked AC=0. I know
because I just now looked.

>
> -- gil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
If you sent twitter messages while exploring, are you on a textpedition?

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to