Good point. I dunno. I am obviously less than a total expert.

FWIW I am only explicitly loading FOO #2 which *is* RENT REUS.

The system is loading FOO #1, which is the NORENT FOO. It's MVS's problem. MVS 
seems to manage lots of NORENT programs with no problem, so I think this is 
going to be okay.

I'm also using LINK, not LOAD/BALR. I believe LINK manages usage counts and 
deletion implicitly. DELETE is not my problem in any event. Life is good.

Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 4:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible to LINK to other program of same name as one in storage?

On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:42:56 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:

>Au contraire, I think I just solved this.
>
>I am so used to making everything RENT that I don't think about it anymore:
>RENT is just a given.
>
>But I just linked FOO #1 NORENT,NOREUS and voila! the BLDL and LINK 
>against
>MY.LOAD.LIB(FOO) produced the desired result. (FWIW, that FOO is RN/RU 
>but I don't think that's relevant.)
> 
Hmmm...  So when you LOAD something that's NORENT,NOREUS, you get another copy. 
 Each time.  But when you DELETE it, which one goes away?  The most recent?  
The oldest?  Other (specify?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to