Yes, it's a sample. In the words of the great computer scientist Graham Nash, "Teach your children well ..."
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Is there any tools or interface which could analyse or monitor SYS1.MANX directly? On 16/06/2015 9:23 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > Obviously a nit-pick and I knew that when I posted it. Hence the LOL. But a > shop might write 100 million SMF records a day. These instructions will get > exercised for most (IEFU83) of them. Even one cycle per tends to add up. I > have had to learn the new way of thinking: instructions don't count; storage > references count. An unneeded reference to storage is potentially very > wasteful of cycles. True. But it's a sample so hack away. The trouble with assembler is it doesn't have an optimizer. The programmer is the optimizer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
