In <[email protected]>, on
07/03/2015
at 04:33 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<[email protected]> said:
>On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:42:45 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>>on 06/26/2015 at 12:12 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>>
>>>Isn't there a timing window right here?
>>
>>Not unless you add FREE=CLOSE to the DD.
>>
>No.
RYFM.
>I believe this thread was discussing two steps:
Il va sans dire.
>//X DD DISP=OLD,DSN=DATA.SET.NAME
No FREE=CLOSE.
>//* STEP 1 concludes; ENQ is freed;
Not even close <g>
>timing window occurs.
There is no new timing window because there is no DEQ for
SYSZDSN/DATA.SET.NAME until the end of the last step using it. If STEP
1 is the last step to use it, then there is a window regardless of how
the downgrade is set. --
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
