(This whole season feels like Friday.) A doughnut, on the other hand, requires 
the hole for its very definition. The hole supplies no mass or nutritional 
value, but without it the thing is not a doughnut. By contrast a punch card 
requires the solid part to give the holes meaning; they would otherwise 
collapse into gibberish. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Barry Merrill
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: What's a "ton" of JCL? [was:RE: Straightforward way to 
determine hardware architecture level?]

I think a box of 2000 IBM cards is on the order of 6 pounds, so a TON of JCL 
cards would be 333 boxes, or about 666,666 card images.

But, the useful weight is zero, since we only use the holes.

Barry


Herbert W. "Barry" Merrill, PhD
President-Programmer
MXG Software
Merrill Consultants
10717 Cromwell Drive
Dallas, TX 75229-5112
[email protected]
Fax:  214 350 3694 - Still works, received as email
Tel:  214 351 1966 - Unreliable, please use email

www.mxg.com        HomePage: FAQ answers most questions
[email protected]      License Forms, Invoice, Payment, ftp information
[email protected]    Technical Issues 
MXG-L FREE ListServer  http://www.mxg.com/mxg-l_listserver/



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: What's a "ton" of JCL? [was:RE: Straightforward way to determine 
hardware architecture level?]

Re: "ton" of JCL, at least one large shop of my prior acquaintance (20 or so 
years ago) had over 250,000 members in the production applications JCL 
libraries.

Not sure how much of that was obsolete at the time, but the batch operations 
control product they used had vast quantities of data as well.

I think that counts as a "ton" or 2 . . . :)

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 9:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Straightforward way to determine hardware architecture level?

<Snipped>

. . . migrating from Cobol 4 to Cobol 5 without changing a ton of JCL (how much 
JCL is a "ton" anyway?).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to