In <[email protected]>, on 12/23/2015
at 08:50 AM, Kurt Quackenbush <[email protected]> said:
>This is an interesting idea, which I'm curious to hear opinions
>on. If doing a mass APPLY (not using the SELECT operand), and
>PTFs are stopped because of a PE (ERROR HOLD), either directly
>or in a requisite chain that is stuck because of a PE, what RC
>should be used to identify this condition? RC=8? 4? 0?
I favor 4.
>Other ideas?
HOLDCC=foo and ERRORHOLDCC=bar options.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
