<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Is a return code of 4 more appropriate for PTFs not applied because of > error hold? This is an interesting idea, which I'm curious to hear opinions on. If doing a mass APPLY (not using the SELECT operand), and PTFs are stopped because of a PE (ERROR HOLD), either directly or in a requisite chain that is stuck because of a PE, what RC should be used to identify this condition? RC=8? 4? 0? Other ideas? Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal preference: PTF not applied RC=8 (unchanged) HOLDSYSTEM: RC=4 for the following IDs: MULTSYS, IOGEN, FULLGEN, EXRF, EXIT, EC, DEP, DDDEF, DB2BIND, ACTION, DOWNLD, DELETE. I normally review the above IDs. RC=0 for other HOLDSYS IDs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
