On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[email protected]> wrote: > In > <29b16432403d6c45a9bee5f0302d191779b9f...@vss-exchmb1.sfg.corp.LOCAL>, > on 12/23/2015 > at 05:27 PM, "Pommier, Rex" <[email protected]> said: > >>Maybe in way of compromise, SMP/E should set a RC=6 instead of 8 >>where maintenance is stopped due to an error hold. :-) > > How does an error hold differ from a system hold? > Where a PTF has an ERROR worse than the problem it fixes and IBM recommends NOT installing.
> I'd like an RC08 if a sysmod in SELECT can't go on do to a hold of any > type, and an RC04 if a sysmod not in a SELECT can't go on due to a > hold, regardless of the type of hold. PARM options to control cc > setttings wouldn't hurt. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
