Look again.
376B ¬= 376E

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Mainframe Mainframe <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello All,
>               Thanks for all suggestion and we are very close to solve the
> issue. Let me explain what all I did,
>
> 1) created one more PROG member and copied all LNKLST definition.
> 2) CHANGED LNKLST00 to LNKLST01 ---- created new one.
> 3) run Seprog command for activating new setprog parmlib member
> 4) Activated new lnklst.
> 5) Then updated system to use new lnklst01
>
> Now I am able to access SDSF too. But my basic issue still there, for which
> I started this thread ---- device not going offline
>
> I am still not able to make my primary res volume which I am not using it
> now, as my system is ipl'd from Alt res volume . I tried checking
> allocation that who is holding it
>
> /D U,DASD,ALLOC,376B,1
> IEE106I 23.31.48 UNITS ALLOCATED 329
> UNIT    JOBNAME  ASID   JOBNAME  ASID   JOBNAME  AS
> 376E    OMVS     000F
>
> But I am not understanding how OMVS is using this device.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Tom Marchant wrote:
> >
> > >>Sorry, Tom, with my utmost respect to you, for production systems, I
> > agree to disagree.
> > >That's ok. We can disagree.
> >
> > Thanks very much.
> >
> >
> > >But please allow me to explain a bit.
> > >Dynamic linklist is one of the more difficult to get right, but there
> are
> > a lot of dynamic facilities. I wouldn't want to run a system without them
> > these days.
> >
> > Agreed. (What would the life be if I could not do a SETROPTS REFRESH, but
> > rather to IPL just to refresh RACF profiles? Ouch...)
> >
> > > ...
> > >Dynamic exits ...
> > > ...
> >
> > Including SMF exits and RACF IRREVX01 exit. The very fact they're dynamic
> > saved my skin many times.
> >
> > For example, I have changed the IEFUJI to instead looking for a fixed
> > table in a loadlib, rather look in RACF for authorized accounting codes
> for
> > batch jobs. No IPL anymore for a new accounting code! Yah!
> >
> >
> > >Dynamic changes to SMS
> >
> > Yup! Badly coded things in SMS can be overridden later via dynamic
> > commands. I also liked that testing facility in ISMF. The storage guys
> > after me were grateful for that!
> >
> >
> > >Most of these can cause problems if used incorrectly. Many of them also
> > make the Sys Prog's life easier.
> >
> > Thanks for sharing my sentiments. Here I agree 100% with you.
> >
> > I think I will climb off this topic ( dead horse? ;-D ) to spare the OP
> > some useless reading... ;-)
> >
> > This ad-free thread is really interesting to follow!
> >
> > Groete / Greetings
> > Elardus Engelbrecht
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to