Bigendian Smalls wrote: > It was an AS400 according to the full report Really an "AS/400"? Or iSeries? Or System i? or IBM i? Just hard to believe it was really that old.
Thanks, eh? I have the report somewhere, but too slammed to dig through it... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
