Timothy Sipples wrote: >No, IBM is correct about IBM, at least on this occasion. Examples:
>IBM Power Systems(tm) >speedy POWER(r) processors >the latest POWER8(r) technology >http://www.ibm.com/legal/us/en/copytrade.shtml Wow. Fascinating! And bizarre. If IBM can't be consistent about this stuff, there's no hope for the rest of the world. Hey, where's "IBM i for Power" on that page? Makes me wonder about its canonical-ness (canonicality?)... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
