Hi, It sounds like you have a situation where the CF you're attempting to IPL is running on a CPC with a different CTNID than the CTNID of the CPC[s] where other images are already active (z/OS and CFs). I'd have to compare the CTNID in the output of the IXL160E as well as the IEA386I from the D ETR of active system[s] in the sysplex to know for sure, but if it the case then you'll need to get the CTNIDs to match.
Is this the first attempt to activate the CF - if so was STP configured on the CF CPC? Versus if it was after a configuration change made to an existing CF, do you expect the STP configuration or the CTNID to change? Changing CTNIDs *can* be disruptive so please check with your local or IBM hardware support if you don't understand this already. Kieron Hinds z/OS Integration Test / System z Platform Evaluation Test From: Nathan Astle <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 06/13/2016 01:54 PM Subject: Sysplex Timer issue Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> Hi, We are receiving the error message on CF, while IPling . IXL160E CF REQUEST TIME ORDERING: REQUIRED AND NOT-ENABLED 194 REASON: CTNID MISMATCH The ETR I displayed in the Console is different from the error message. Does it mean i have to correct that in the IOGEN ? Jake ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
