Tim Hare wrote: >Because of scheduling dumbness (another story) they have several gaps in their >batch window where nothing runs, giving some leeway for jobs to increase their >elapsed time - not the usual thing you want to do, but bear with us.
What are the other STCs doing? Were they also busy or were they also idling? >Would it be worth investigating setting a resource group limit for the batch >service class(es) to hold the total 4HRA down as a cost-saving measure, or are >resource group limits going to cause more trouble than they are worth? Good question. If you get any good replies on that, please post them on IBM-MAIN if you can. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
