I think auditors must have an annual convention and decide what to add to their checklist at some SCIDS equivalent.
Len Rugen Metrics and Automation – [email protected] Myth: If You Can’t Measure It, You Can’t Manage It, but if you have data, it’s not cheating to use it. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of retired mainframer Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Adding Module to an empty APFed Library > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 8:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Adding Module to a empty APFed Library > > Just a note. Auditors hate it when we have an APF list entry with no > dataset. Makes them cringe. I wonder why. The only time it would have any effect is if something is added to it. Adding to an empty APF library is hardly different than adding to a populated one. Did they ever discuss what additional exposure they thought it created? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
