http://m.isaca.org/Education/Conferences/Pages/GRC-registration.aspx
<g>
CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity
-------- Original message --------
From: "Rugen, Len" <[email protected]>
Date: 8/3/16 12:41 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Adding Module to an empty APFed Library
I think auditors must have an annual convention and decide what to add to their
checklist at some SCIDS equivalent.
Len Rugen
Metrics and Automation – [email protected]
Myth: If You Can’t Measure It, You Can’t Manage It, but if you have data, it’s
not cheating to use it.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of retired mainframer
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Adding Module to an empty APFed Library
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 8:07 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Adding Module to a empty APFed Library
>
> Just a note. Auditors hate it when we have an APF list entry with no
> dataset. Makes them cringe.
I wonder why. The only time it would have any effect is if something is added
to it. Adding to an empty APF library is hardly different than adding to a
populated one.
Did they ever discuss what additional exposure they thought it created?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
