On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:19:42 -0500, Bill Woodger wrote: > >My exit was in COBOL. COBOL IO for a KSDS is considerably slower than DFSORT >itself does it, and REPRO is even better at flattening a KSDS. > >On top of the IO differences, you have the overhead of the exit. > Might one use REPRO instead of COBOL in the exit? Still bearing the overhead of the exit.
Might one POSIX-pipe the output of REPRO into (a catenand of) SORTIN? That becomes a contest between the overhead of the DFSORT exit and the overhead of POSIX pipes. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
