On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:48:41 -0500, Bill Woodger wrote: > >... It would not be nice ... [to] ... replicate what is already available in >DFSORT and which would be used for the sequential datasets anyway (would there >be benefit in piping those just for the heck of it?). > (I hope I haven't altered the sense by massive trimming.)
That presumes that all useful filters already exist in DFSORT (which might be pretty close, but REPRO appears to be a refutation) or don't already exist elsewhere and can't be coded in another language more readily than as DFSORT commands. >Just to note, the two tasks which process the two inputs to JOINKEYS >effectively "pipe" to the main task. > I didn't know about that. How does JOINKEYS interact with the exits? Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
