On 9/4/2016 10:45 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
All of this is why I default to the often disparaged XMIT/RECEIVE when going 
MVS to MVS. I can almost always get a data set moved that way in less time than 
it takes to (re)correct FTP syntax. XMIT/RECEIVE also works to/from z/VM RSCS.

XMIT is slow and has the _major_ disadvantages of requiring NJE connectivity between systems and having to issue a RECEIVE command on the target system. It's OK for a one-off transfer between known NJE partners, but IMHO FTP's speed, universal connectivity, and MGET/MPUT functionality make it well worth the relatively small investment in time to learn how to use its options to get your transfers to work right the first time...

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to