That appears to show the current status, not what was defined in the SMS SG for the volume.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 10:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMS Volume Status What I meant was with option 6, then option 1, then LISTV in front of the SG. This will give you all the volumes, which you can sort on SMS status, e.g. col. 25. Kees. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Kreiter Sent: 12 October, 2016 16:17 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMS Volume Status I guess I should have clarified a little more. I'm looking to find volumes that have a current status that does not match what is defined in the storage group. We rarely make SMS changes. What has happened over time is that some volumes have been DISNEW'ed to clear them or ENABLED (from DISNEW) to allow for new allocations. These were all done via the VARY SMS,VOLUME(xxxxxx),DISABLE,NEW type commands. Now, we have an ACS routine change that is going to reset volume status back to what was defined. If I list a volume in ISMF option 6 by selection option 5 - Volume, I can see the mismatch but this is limited to no more than 100 volumes and I have thousands to check: System/Sys SMS VOL MVS Vol SMS G Group Name Status Status Status ----------- ------- -------- ------ SYS1 DISNEW ONLINE ENABLE I'm really looking for this info in a batch (ideally) report. I've looked through Naviquest but not seen anything that reports this yet. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Kreiter Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: SMS Volume Status I'm looking for a way to identify volumes in a SMS storage group that have a different status than what was defined in the storage group (i.e. volumes that are enabled in the storage group that are currently DISNEW because a vary command was issued). Anyone know of a way to identify this? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
