Hi Robert, I try ISPVCALL on Sam's system and it works without any issue. Roland
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Robert Prins Gesendet: Samstag, 21. Januar 2017 14:06 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: ISPCFIGU - which one? [SOLVED - sort of] Prepend is concatenate them in front of what's there, append is at the back. ;) I seem to have solved the problem by regenerating my private command tables from scratch, rather than using the 1.10 & 1.6 versions that I had copied to the ISPF profile dataset from my 1.10 system (and "that" system). This part now works. However, ISPVCALL still hangs and gobbles up all the CPU it can get. (So as a "solution" I won't use it for now) I do however think that the current set-up, where there are already four ISPCFIGU load modules present is not ideal, to put it mildly, but maybe some of you more at home in these matters might have another opinion you could share. Robert -- Robert AH Prins robert.ah.prins(a)gmail.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
