OK, you're the authority. It's been to long for me to clearly remember. But, I did have some difficulty running ACCEPT after I'd messed with which PTFs were in which SMPPTSn.
And since my current practice of just adding another SMPPTSn when I need it works, I won't be attempting to recreate the issue. 😊 > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 6:51 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Can SMPPTS datasets be consolidated? > > On 3/16/2017 7:25 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote: > > Has this always been so? Sometime ago (1.7, 1.9) I had ACCEPT fail > > because I had compressed and moved members into lower sequenced > > SMPPTSn At least I think I remember this. I've just always added > > another SMPPTSz ever since. > > Yes, ever since we added the SMPPTS spill data set function (year 2000) > SMP/E has allowed you to merge data sets, move PTFs from data set to data > set, add data sets, whatever you want to do, as long as the SMPPTSnn DDDEF > entries in your global, target, and dlib zones point to your current set of > SMPPTS data sets. > > Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
