On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:54:38 -0400, John Eells wrote: > >> However nowadays we have PDSE v2 with much bigger limit for member size. > >It's for that reason, among others, that we have PTF size limits, and >the maximum size of a PDSE V1 member was one of the things on the list >(now replaced by the maximum size of a PDS member, because we do not >require the use of PDSEs for SMPPTS data sets). ... > The SMP/E Ref. still recommends PDSE. I won't bother with an RCF mentioning PDSE V2.
Does IBM break enormous PTFs into mutualy coREQ pieces? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
