Perhaps I did not accurately read the introductory post for this topic, but if 
we are considering 360 and its descendants, I am surprised no one has mentioned 
either SVS or VS1 (though I did see where MVS was mentioned). One of my first 
jobs out of college (70s) involved a conversion from SVS to VS2. A later job 
involved bringing a site from VS1 to MVS/370.



Bill Hitefield

Dino-Software Corporation

800.480.DINO

423.878.5660

www.dino-software.com





-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 12:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mainframe operating systems?



http://hercules390.996247.n3.nabble.com/What-is-the-Telpar-OS-td17474.html

Pretty sure they got it running.  Fits on 1 track.



On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Timothy Sipples 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

> I have a few more additions:

>

> 1. These Japanese operating systems are probably worth mentioning:

>

> Hitachi VOS3

> Fujitsu MSP

> Fujitsu XSP

>

> VOS3 and MSP are proven forks of IBM MVS/XA (at least, and likely also

> MVS/ESA). XSP might be a fork of DOS/VSE. (I'm less familiar with that

> one.) If you want to hang your hat on supported compatibility with

> real world IBM machines then VOS3 probably wins. As I recall, VOS3

> officially runs on z800 and z890 machines, at least. Hitachi built the

> z800 in a collaboration with IBM, and also for its own domestic sales

> in Japan, so that one is not a great surprise.

>

> To my knowledge, Fujitsu is still nominally in the mainframe business

> in Japan, and their machines are basically ESA/390 machines. Both MSP

> and XSP remain ESA (31-bit), as far as I know. Hitachi's Japanese

> domestic market machines are ESA/390 machines with very modest,

> non-z/Architecture 64-bit extensions that VOS3 only lightly exploits.

>

> Speaking of related machines, did RCA's operating systems like VMOS

> and TSOS ever run on IBM System/360 machines?

>

> 2. TCSC's EDOS/VS and EDOS/VSE were interesting forks of DOS/VS Release 34.

> EDOS/VS and EDOS/VSE were compatible with machines that did not have

> virtual storage support, including System/360 machines. That's why

> they enjoyed some popularity. NCSC produced a UNIX subsystem for EDOS

> called PWS, inspired by Coherent UNIX. I'm not sure if NCSC ever made

> PWS available for IBM DOS/VSE and its successors.

>

> 3. I don't think anybody mentioned IBM's OS/44 and PS/44 yet. Those

> were operating systems for the System/360 Model 44, a scientific market 
> machine.

>

> 4. I don't think anybody mentioned VM/IX and IX/370 yet, from

> Interactive Systems Corporation (ISC). Those were different than

> AIX/370 and AIX/ESA, based on Locus Computing's work. Bell Labs had a

> UNIX operating system for

> System/370 even before ISC's products, but I don't know much about that.

> MVS OpenEdition was the successor to these efforts, although with yet

> another, different, much better technology base. MVS OpenEdition begat

> z/OS UNIX System Services.

>

> 5. Boston University's VPS/VM traced its roots to McGill University's

> RACS (later RAX, then MUSIC/SP) operating system. As far as I know

> VPS/VM always ran under IBM's VM, but perhaps that wasn't required.

> VPS/VM and MUSIC/SP are thus "cousins," one could argue.

>

> 6. TELPAR dates to the early 1970s, but I don't know much about it. I

> think it's available in open source (PL/360) form, though. Has anybody

> tried compiling and running it?

>

> 7. VP/CSS, developed by National CSS, was an evolution of CP/CMS.

> VP/CSS had some efficiency advantages back in the 1970s.

>

> 8. Some people might classify Jan Jaeger's ZZSA as an operating

> system, a very basic one.

>

> 9. Did the UCSD p-System ever end up on System/370 or System/390 machines?

> It ended up on almost every other processor.

>

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----------------------------------

> Timothy Sipples

> IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA

> E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

>

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

> email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the 
> message: INFO IBM-MAIN







--

Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA

Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the message: 
INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to