It's all about user broadcast. It that's in use, all user-directed messages go there instead of SYS1.BRODCAST. Hence UACC(UPDATE) is not appropriate. Our SYS1.BRODCAST contains only 'broadcast' messages that all users see at logon or in response to LISTBC; nothing personal. We actually run with UACC(NONE) because public accesses come via system function, not user-initiated.
. . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of gsg Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 12:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: (External):Re: SYS1.BRODCAST What if people code their jobs with the NOTIFY parameter? Doesn't that update SYS1.BRODCAST? If so, then it wouldn't be able to update it. Or does that authority come from somewhere else? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
