One thing the legal department needs to be asked about: How long do they have to be able to reproduce reports/documents or be able to do a report?

Now, will the new system be able to process the old system's data for that period, or will some arrangement need to be made to do this with their data? And on what media with what format will that data need to be kept?

Meanwhile, I've read much of what others were saying and I agree with the majority. And I say that having been involved with several "modernization" upgrades -- Euphemism for getting off a mainframe.

Sometime one should draw two pictures. The one should be a conceptual diagram of a non-mainframe system (generally bus-centric) and then a mainframe system (typically, RAM or Memory Centric). Don't identify the two architectures. And ask which one they would want to be using for their system to process all their data.

Now it is OK to label the bus between CPUs and memory as being 256 bytes wide. The bus from memory to IOPs is about 64 bytes wide.

The non-mainframe buses are 8 bytes to 16 bytes wide (64 to 128 bits) as I recall (I think certain machines are now multiplexing the Data Bus).

Again, this is conceptual because of PCIe, the bus may be split into "channels" of 8-32bits wide (off the top of my head).

The drawing I did were for a few people that were just absolutely sure that the sales people from the vendor's offices were correct that they could run rings around a mainframe.

Once I explained clock speeds, bus widths, cache sizes, they were just astonished. And then they realized my estimates of how many machines they were going to need to replace their small mainframe was probably closer to reality.

If you get the chance, you should ask the CFO at what point would the migration have to stop? Or have they even considered a financial hard stop point?

Now, if they were doing a migration to another system where they were going to use all packaged software, they would probably meet their deadlines and hit their budget numbers. But if they aren't doing that, but are going to migrate your systems to the other platform using a bunch of programmers --- You are paying for a one off software development project. That is, you are buying a one off software development project and then financing the project.

Regards,
Steve Thompson

On 05/03/2017 08:57 AM, Allan Staller wrote:
From previous experience (with another vendor),

Beware of any promises made by sales team (sales, tech marketing,....).
If (whatever it is) is promised and agreed to, ensure it is written into the 
contract with an appropriate penalty for non-performance (up to and including 
cancellation of the contract w/refund).
Of course it would be up to your legal team to ensure proper contract contents.
<SNIPPAGE>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to