Hi,

thanks for the responses so far.

The goal is to have the server (an ancient DEC alpha running some sort of SNA 
application of which I'm ignorant) that now has a TR link into the FEP connect 
to the z13 which no longer has ESCON.

Going by the CNA8000 doc it claims this is possible, but I'm interested in your 
statement that it won't help.  The Visara pages seem to indicate the CNA8000 
can do SNA-over-TR and FICON.  We have been first before but naturally prefer 
others to have blazed the trail if possible as there is less appetite for being 
first these days.

We are aware of the Optica ESBT option but would prefer a single "black box" 
rather than two, and like the prospect of having no more bus and tag cables as 
will be needed with the ESBT; nevertheless we still have the ESBT as an option.

Regarding the FEP being unsupported, yes, this is understood by the customer.  

thanks again,
Peter


On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:13:37 +0200, R.S. <[email protected]> wrote:

>It still do not clarify what is your goal.
>Now we know you have some TR segment connected to the FEP. Fine, but
>what else is connected to the token ring? What device is connected? What
>protocol is used?
>
>My guess is you are using some SNA and CNA8000 won't help you.
>
>BTW: You can connect 9034 to ESCON/FICON converter from Optica (name:
>PRIZM) and still have your FEP on B&T and ESCON converter. But this is
>very expensive - approx. 50k USD.
>
>HTH
>
>--
>Radoslaw Skorupka
>Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>W dniu 2017-07-22 o 05:10, Peter Bishop pisze:
>> Hi,
>>
>> currently we have a TR link going into a FEP which connects via bus and tag 
>> to a 9034 which then connects via ESCON to a z196, but we're going z13 and 
>> so need FICON link.  The CNA8000 would appear to be able to replace both the 
>> FEP and the 9034 if we configure it right as it has TR and FICON ports.  
>> We're stuck with TR.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:30:24 +0000, Jim Stefanik <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would ask the same question - what's the end-goal?  If you're just trying 
>>> to test something or revive some old gear for a while, an IBM 8229 LAN 
>>> Bridge can be had for bugger all off eBay.  It just bridges traffic between 
>>> an Ethernet LAN and a token ring LAN.  If this is a more permanent thing, 
>>> there are probably more modern and better supported solutions, since the 
>>> 8229 is quite old (20+ years...!).  I wouldn't recommend using an 8229 in a 
>>> production environment for anything critical due to its age and lack of 
>>> support from IBM.
>> -Jim
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
>> R.S. <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 06:02
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Visara CNA8000 question
>>
>> W dniu 2017-07-21 o 07:49, Peter Bishop pisze:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we have a possible need to connect a token-ring link to a z13 (don't ask) 
>>> and were considering one option, but now another has appeared.
>>>
>>> We're wondering if anyone else is using a Visara CNA8000 for this?  It 
>>> seems a simpler option than the other one as it takes a token-ring link on 
>>> one side and a FICON link on the other.
>> What's your goal?
>> For that excercise I would ask what about TR and Eth networks connected
>> via some router supporting TCP/IP protocol.
>> For Visara I bet you could get something like local (non-SNA) console
>> with TR connection, but from host point of view it works like OSA-ICC
>> console/terminal.
>>
>> --
>> Radoslaw Skorupka
>> Lodz, Poland
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ======================================================================
>>
>
>
>======================================================================
>
>
>        --
> Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
> przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być 
> jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś 
> adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej 
> przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, 
> rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie 
> zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, 
> prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale 
> usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub 
> zapisane na dysku.
>
> This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
> intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
> received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If 
> you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized 
> to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
> distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
> punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
> immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
> permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
> hard drive.
>
> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, 
> www.mBank.pl, e-mail: [email protected]ąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII 
> Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców 
> KRS 0000025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. 
> kapitał zakładowy mBanku S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to