I disagree. The point of reconfiguration is also to recover from checkpoint loss.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 31, 2017, at 3:00 AM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM > <[email protected]> wrote: > > But still, if both checkpoints were in CF's, the POR cleared both of them, so > there is nothing to reconfigure. A COLD start would indeed be the fastest. > > Kees. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Gerhard Adam >> Sent: 28 July, 2017 18:17 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question >> >> I wasn't sure if you were aware that you can make up a NEWCKPT >> dynamically and if it doesn't exist, JES2 will prompt you to create it. >> >> That way if you don't have an existing definition, you can still get a >> new data set created and migrated to. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:15 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question >> >> thank you >> I decided to do a cold start due to the fact while an attempt to move to >> NEWCKPRT1 or 2 during startup I received I/O errors on the CKPT files, >> due to time constrains on my downtime I had to get the systems back up. >> I've since read there are somethings I could have tried to recover, but >> at the time....there was no time. >> >> >> Carmen >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Gerhard Adam" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:08:21 AM >> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question >> >> You shouldn't need both on DASD. However, I am curious as to why you had >> to COLD start. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 6:55 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: JES2 Checkpoint question >> >> I've looked and looked at the Init and Tuning REF and Guide and I can't >> seem to find an answer to my question, I'm hoping someone can provide a >> sanity check for me. >> I have a 2 system JES2 MAS both running z/OS 2.1, both checkpoints are >> currently in a CF with mode=duplex and duplex=on. >> my issue is both CF's are in the same CEC so a POR of the box for maint >> last month I lost all my prod spool data and was forced to perform a >> JES2 cold start. I need to move CKPT1 to DASD and I want to leave CKPT2 >> in the CF, so my question is can I still run with mode=duplex and >> duplex=on in that configuration, or do I need to have both CKPT's on >> DASD. >> Any insight or recommendations would be very helpful, thank you all >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ******************************************************** > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential > and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may > be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to > this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you > have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by > return e-mail, and delete this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its > employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of > this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered > number 33014286 > ******************************************************** > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
