I think I remember from the past, when we had CKPT in the CF, that only 1 of every 10 writes to the primary ckpt is done to the secondary. So having the secondary on dasd will cause minimal performance degradation, if that were a concern.
Kees. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo > Sent: 31 July, 2017 14:24 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question > > That what I was thinking, according to the doc, and its not 100% clear I > can recover from a lost CKPT, so does that assume just one lost CKPT > while JES2 is up, or during a shutdown, there are so many different > recovery scenarios' but none that fit my situation. > It was my bad planning, putting both CKPT's in the CF's and not planning > this thru to the power down - POR > lessons learned here. > thank again all > Carmen > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Kees Vernooij (ITOPT1) - KLM" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:16:09 AM > Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question > > I agree, that I can recover JES2 to use new checkpoints if the originals > are definitely gone, but that was not the case here. > What can I recover, when both checkpoints have been emptied by the POR? > > Kees. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On > > Behalf Of Gerhard Adam > > Sent: 31 July, 2017 12:11 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question > > > > I disagree. The point of reconfiguration is also to recover from > > checkpoint loss. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Jul 31, 2017, at 3:00 AM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > But still, if both checkpoints were in CF's, the POR cleared both of > > them, so there is nothing to reconfigure. A COLD start would indeed be > > the fastest. > > > > > > Kees. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- > [email protected]] > > On > > >> Behalf Of Gerhard Adam > > >> Sent: 28 July, 2017 18:17 > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question > > >> > > >> I wasn't sure if you were aware that you can make up a NEWCKPT > > >> dynamically and if it doesn't exist, JES2 will prompt you to create > > it. > > >> > > >> That way if you don't have an existing definition, you can still > get > > a > > >> new data set created and migrated to. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- > [email protected]] > > On > > >> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo > > >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:15 AM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question > > >> > > >> thank you > > >> I decided to do a cold start due to the fact while an attempt to > move > > to > > >> NEWCKPRT1 or 2 during startup I received I/O errors on the CKPT > > files, > > >> due to time constrains on my downtime I had to get the systems back > > up. > > >> I've since read there are somethings I could have tried to recover, > > but > > >> at the time....there was no time. > > >> > > >> > > >> Carmen > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> > > >> From: "Gerhard Adam" <[email protected]> > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:08:21 AM > > >> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question > > >> > > >> You shouldn't need both on DASD. However, I am curious as to why > you > > had > > >> to COLD start. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- > [email protected]] > > On > > >> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo > > >> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 6:55 AM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: JES2 Checkpoint question > > >> > > >> I've looked and looked at the Init and Tuning REF and Guide and I > > can't > > >> seem to find an answer to my question, I'm hoping someone can > provide > > a > > >> sanity check for me. > > >> I have a 2 system JES2 MAS both running z/OS 2.1, both checkpoints > > are > > >> currently in a CF with mode=duplex and duplex=on. > > >> my issue is both CF's are in the same CEC so a POR of the box for > > maint > > >> last month I lost all my prod spool data and was forced to perform > a > > >> JES2 cold start. I need to move CKPT1 to DASD and I want to leave > > CKPT2 > > >> in the CF, so my question is can I still run with mode=duplex and > > >> duplex=on in that configuration, or do I need to have both CKPT's > on > > >> DASD. > > >> Any insight or recommendations would be very helpful, thank you all > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > - > > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send > > >> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > - > > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM- > > MAIN > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > - > > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM- > > MAIN > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > - > > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM- > > MAIN > > > ******************************************************** > > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. > If > > you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail > > or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that > any > > other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and > delete > > this message. > > > > > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries > and/or > > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for > any > > delay in receipt. > > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal > > Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with > > registered number 33014286 > > > ******************************************************** > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM- > MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ******************************************************** > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If > you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail > or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any > other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly > prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by > error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete > this message. > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or > its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any > delay in receipt. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch > Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered > number 33014286 > ******************************************************** > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
