Exactly Walt.

As always,

Thank you,

Scott

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:51 AM Walt Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:35:23 +0000, scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote:
> >We are using all functions, since we function as what is now being called
> a
> >central site administrator.
>
> If you are indeed using _all_ the functions of r_admin (which I suppose is
> possible, though it seems unlikely to me) then you will need to be able to
> run in supervisor state as required for some of the functions. Therefore, I
> believe that APF-authorization will be important to you, and attempting to
> have all your modules linked as AC(0) will not work. You will need at least
> the initial module linked AC(1), and run from an authorized library, so you
> can switch to supervisor state before invoking those functions.
>
> Alternatively, I suppose you could run without APF-authorization if you
> have your initial program listed in the PPT as requiring a system key, as
> running in a system key will also allow you to switch to supervisor state.
> On the whole, though, running APF-authorized is probably simpler and may be
> safer.
>
> --
> Walt
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
-- 
Scott Ford
IDMWORKS
z/OS Development

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to