I miss CA-1.  I found it much easier to use than RMM.  I am constantly trying 
to remember how to find things in RMM that were so simple to find in CA-1.  
What I especially miss is the reporting in CA-1.  They were so simple to 
create.  I find that I have to utilize FDR/ABR reporting to give me the RMM 
reports I want.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 10:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CA1 to RMM conversion

On 10/25/2017 10:35 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
>
> The real question should be is how is IBM support for RMM?

I don't know in the general case, but anecdotally I once I had a situation 
where RMM was *DOWN* (SEV 1) abending at startup. The support folks on the 
other end seemed unable to glean much from the SVC dump I'd sent, so they asked 
a bunch of rudimentary questions, made one useless suggestion after another, 
asked for this and that trace, and generally "dinked" around until I was ready 
to pull my hair out. (We were dead in the water for a couple of days.)

In desperation, I wrote to Mike Wood (now retired) and sent him my PMR number. 
He was _astonished_ at the (lack of good) support I was getting! 
He scolded his support team and told them straight away what the problem likely 
was.

Thanks to Mike's help, my systems were up within the hour...

--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to