I'm not sure that the recent discussion on ATTACHing the TMP is directly relevant. CALL doesn't change the TCB or PRB used.
Irregardless, there's no good reason to CALL the TMP. Just say no. sas On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Wayne Driscoll <[email protected]> wrote: > See Jim Mulder's recent post about the design of IKJEFTxx expecting to be > executed as a job step TCB (ie it's own TCBJSTCB field points to itself, as > well as other internal details), and you will see that this isn't supported > for reasons of MVS integrity. > > Wayne Driscoll > Rocket Software > Note - All opinions are strictly my own. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
