On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> Actually, IBM recommends use of RDJFCB rather than direct use of SWAREQ, > or at least used to. Note that with RDJFCB you can request an ARL for a > concatenation rather than just the information for a single DD. However, > it is certainly possible to retrieve the information using pure C, although > the code wouldn't be as clean and might stop working in a future release. > > Exactly. It is much better IMO to write small Assembler routines for these kind of things and then call them from C/C++/whatever ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
