On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:41:31 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:

>FWIW, I am guessing "255" was simply a brain-glitch for 100, and had no
>basis in any actual technology.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:42:20 -0800, Tom Ross wrote:
>    ...
>Someone else asked what the COMPILER limit for reading the PARM=
>options string is, but there is none.  There is a JCL/JES limit of
>255 bytes.  There is no limit for SYSOPTF (using OPTFILE).
I remain puzzled that a need with a solution as obvious as PARMDD
causes an RFE.

-- gil

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to