On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:41:31 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >FWIW, I am guessing "255" was simply a brain-glitch for 100, and had no >basis in any actual technology. > On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:42:20 -0800, Tom Ross wrote: > ... >Someone else asked what the COMPILER limit for reading the PARM= >options string is, but there is none. There is a JCL/JES limit of >255 bytes. There is no limit for SYSOPTF (using OPTFILE). > I remain puzzled that a need with a solution as obvious as PARMDD causes an RFE.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
