On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:13:05 -0800, Tom Ross wrote: > >In response to other posts and Frank, I agree that we should answer the >RFE for a change to our SYSOPTF support as: "AVAILABLE: Use PARMDD" > Yaaay!
Now you may have to deal with, "But that's not the way we planned to do it." If PARMDD refers to a SYSIN it supports symbol substitution (almost) like EXEC PARM=. There are a few annoying differences. Of course, PARMDD may be a concatenation of library option members (like SYSOPTF). And someone suggested using DDNAME= for more flexibility (again, like SYSOPTF). -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
