As this is your code, it may be worth it to use BPAM rather than do a separate
allocation for each member. Will also save lots of CPU.

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:51:48 +0700 Robin Atwood <abend...@gmail.com> wrote:

:>Greg-
:>The SVC 99s are under my control and that is very useful to know!
:>
:>Thanks
:>Robin
:>
:>-----Original Message-----
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
Behalf Of Greg Price
:>Sent: 03 March 2018 10:10
:>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: Managing JESYSMSG size
:>
:>On 2018-03-02 9:53 PM, Robin Atwood wrote:
:>> Is there anyway via
:>> JES2 or SMS to suppress these messages? Preferably on a per-job basis 
:>> rather than globally
:>
:>Would MSGLEVEL=(n,0) do the trick?
:>
:>If the DYNALLOCs are under your control, you can request this in the relevant 
SVC 99 text unit.
:>
:>Cheers,
:>Greg
:>
:>----------------------------------------------------------------------
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
:>
:>----------------------------------------------------------------------
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to