Paul Gilmartin wrote: >I have, but: >o Since I didn't know the explation involved HLASM when I asked the question, > it's far more likely that I''d have asked here than ASSEBLER-LIST >o IBM's HLASM lead says that since 2003 he's seen no such discussion there.
Ok. >I'd have made the opposite design decision, but since "&&" is endemic >in HLASM source, IBM elected to preserve them. Yes, I have seen that "&&". I had to be careful not to change that unless I want grey hairs... >My RCF went to JES2, where development is inclined to change the behavior. Ah, jes2, oops, yes too ;-) , JES2 has their own very complex interpreter which could stop any unwanted modification of that instream data. (or enforce a change like this famous one 'IEF648I INVALID DISP FIELD- PASS SUBSTITUTED') I really hope you can resolve that problem. Good luck to you! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
