Paul Edwards wrote: >However, *as well as* GETMAIN having the capability I have no problem with >other facilities such as IARV64 being able to do the same thing. I see no reason to hold back GETMAIN. And note that if a program using the IARV64 macro with the new parameter is run on an older system, what do you get then? Memory above 4 GiB? GETMAIN won't have that problem, as it reverts to LOC=31 memory.
Hmmm, interestin what you said. Perhaps you should include IARV64 (as per Jim's suggestion) in your request and then you'll have to wait and see whether it is accepted or not. Good luck! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
