On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:10:15 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote: >On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:04:57 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> >>"implausible"; various instructions work differently in AM24 and AM31, much >>less AM64. > >It's not implausible, it's what I do. I produce 32-bit >load modules that work on all 3 AMODEs. They >passively accept whatever AMODE they were >called with. They don't even require different code >paths internally. > What about exploiting dual address space mode, AR mode, ESA, Hiperspaces, any other historic side roads that mainframe development has followed?
I agree with Shmuel here, perhaps to his dismay. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
