On Fri, 11 May 2018 00:29:40 -0500, somitcw wrote: >SG24-7605-00 >z/OS Version 1 Release 10 Implementation >April 2009 >Pages 6 and 104 >Claims that next to E-Nuc is ESQA, ELPA, ECSA, then E-private.
That illustration in that Redbook is incorrect. >When did they move? They didn't. >Are we requesting a feature that is already there? >IBM could do that real quick. > >Paul's wanting SVC 120 to get memory up to 4GB-1 and >have IARV64 and IARST64 stick with 33 to 64bit addresses >would actually need a couple of code changes and a little >documentation. You don't have a clue what would be required to compatibly dumb down AMODE 64 the way you want it. It is something that provides no benefit for z/OS users, despite all your protestations to the contrary. I agree with Steve, Charles, Jim and others. This is a waste of time. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
