On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:47:08 -0400, Carmen Vitullo wrote:

>Talking about strange dsn allocations, I worked as a contractor Y2K for state 
>Govmt, after updating TLSM to support OS/390 2.5 one of our agency's support 
>folks told me I broke TLMS because the dataset(s) they use to write to take 
>for DOL is, for example DSN='Sears Roebuck and Co', DISP=(,KEEP),UNIT=CART 
>
>well I said, you can't do that ! that's not a valid datasets name, but we've 
>been creating them for many years, I found out I was very wrong, CA knew 
>better and provided a PTF fix for the issue, embarrassed, ah yup , I was ! 
>
When I was very new to MVS I created several data sets with such names.  
Experimenting, self-training
in the use of apostrophes in JCL.  I left them allocated.

Within a few days, admins descended on me, irritated because their utility for
scratching nonconforming data sets couldn't handle them.  Too nonconforming,
I guess.

DFSMS should make the rules.  Assembler and all higher layers should obey them
and not invent additional restrictions.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to