? You admit that you were not familiar with the background.
IBM carried forward AMAPTFLE <https://ia801902.us.archive.org/15/items/bitsavers_ibm360osR2rviceAidsRel21Mar72_14344562/GC28-6719-2_Service_Aids_Rel_21_Mar72.pdf> under the name AMAPTFLE, but it did not do what SMP did., or anything close. You can't even install a PTF that affects multiple target libraries, much less track dependencies. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Edward Gould <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [External] Old School Maintenance Philosophy -- Never ACCEPT? > On May 23, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Gerhard Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > > SMP was available in MVT and MFT. It did not begin with MVS I beg to differ. But I was new to the job and our senior sysprog did maint with another IBM program (which I do not remember but it was NOT SMP but something like iebptfle or something like that. Someone else, please confirm. Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
