On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:26 AM Tom Marchant <
0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:20:18 +0000, Allan Staller wrote:
>
> >Check the releted DDDEF's and the SYSLIB/CALLLIB concat.
>
> SYSLIB? The SYSLIB DDDEF is for assemblies, not for link edits.
>

​True for SMP/E usagre. The Binder, at least in batch, uses the DD SYSLIB
for autocall (CALL option). However, SMP/E, when it scans the ++JCLIN, will
notice any Binder SYSLIBs. It will store the last qualifier as a DDDEF name
in the appropriate LMOD. When the Binder is invoked for that LMOD​, SMP/E
will dynamically allocate the DDDEFs in the LMOD entry to some SMPnnnnn DD
name and pass that name as the alternate SYSLIB name to the Binder.

However, I don't control the LMOD entry, it was set up for me by IBM when I
installed SMP/E and maintained by them. And, just to be complete, AOSBN is
not mentioned in the LMOD SYSLIB equivalent. Only LINKLIB is mentioned in
the Binder SYSMOD for this LMOD.

​Again, the output from SMP/E and the LIST LMOD XREF output can be viewed
on Github here:
https://gist.github.com/JohnArchieMckown/20d995cce8e2f201a4cf9725c4932092


>
> --
> Tom Marchant
>

-- 
Once a government places vague notions of public safety and security above
the preservation of freedom, a general loss of liberty is sure to follow.

GCS Griffin -- Pelaran Alliance -- TFS Guardian (book)


Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to